Northern BC Tahltan Members Question Timing of Mining Payment Before Key Vote
A sign reading "Dudindá" with a bear illustration, set against a rural northern British Columbia landscape.

Northern BC Tahltan Members Question Timing of Mining Payment Before Key Vote

Tahltan debate $40M mining payment before crucial vote on Eskay Creek mine reopening in northern BC. Economic benefits questioned.


Share this post
Based on coverage from CBC, Mining Weekly, and Yahoo News.

Tahltan Members Debate Eskay Creek Mine Proposal

The Tahltan First Nation in northern British Columbia is at a crossroads as members prepare to vote on a significant Impact Benefit Agreement (IBA) with Skeena Resources. The agreement concerns the reopening of the Eskay Creek mine, located roughly 80 kilometres northwest of Stewart, B.C. This decision is pivotal, as the Tahltan have a unique consent-based agreement with the province, making their approval essential for the project to proceed.

Financial Incentives Stir Controversy

A $40-million upfront payment from Skeena Resources has sparked debate among the Tahltan community. If the IBA is ratified, each Tahltan citizen would receive $10,000 next year. While some members view this as a positive step towards economic benefits, others express concern that it might unduly influence the vote. The Tahltan Central Government (TCG) has defended the payment, stating it addresses feedback from community consultations indicating that not all members would directly benefit from the project.

Details of the Impact Benefit Agreement

The IBA promises substantial financial returns for the Tahltan, including $210 million in royalties, $81 million in shares, $17 million for community support, and $10 million for an environmental fund. Skeena Resources projects the mine will contribute $14 billion to the GDP of B.C. and Canada over the next 20 years, alongside $3.6 billion in taxes. Despite these figures, the full contents of the agreement remain confidential, accessible only in hard copies at select law offices in B.C. and the Yukon.

Environmental Concerns and Community Skepticism

Environmental impacts are a significant concern for many Tahltan members. The project, which plans to operate as an open-pit mine, is undergoing an environmental assessment expected to conclude next month. Critics like Cynthia Callison, a Tahltan member and lawyer, worry about potential water contamination affecting salmon runs. David Chambers, a retired geophysicist, has raised alarms about the project's tailings and waste rock management, suggesting they could pose environmental risks, especially in the event of an earthquake.

Looking Ahead: Community Decision and Future Steps

The upcoming vote will determine the community's stance on the IBA, with the Tahltan Central Government expected to make a final decision by January 2026. As the community weighs the economic benefits against environmental and social concerns, the outcome will set a precedent for future resource projects involving First Nations in Canada. The decision will also influence how the Tahltan navigate their significant mineral resources and the protection of vital watersheds like the Skeena, Nass, and Stikine rivers.


Source 1 | Source 2 | Source 3

How the coverage differed

Coverage was consistent across the sources provided, with all reporting on the Tahltan First Nation's vote on the Impact Benefit Agreement (IBA) with Skeena Resources for the Eskay Creek mine project, including the concerns about the timing of an upfront payment. No meaningful differences in coverage were found across the sources provided.


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong